My Plan for a Social Media Diet

14 February, 2010 · 11 comments

Personal scale on a wooden bedroom floor

I consume a large amount of online content. By “consume,” I mean actually reading things. My RSS clients — I use both Google Reader and a nifty, self-hosted program called Fever — are real rivals to the browser as my window on the web. They allow me to search and sort content far more efficiently than clicking from site to site, and fresh information is what powers my writing and thinking.

Naturally, I enjoy sharing what I find. To a fault, in fact, and there are plenty of great venues for this. The latest is Google Buzz, a promising new service which has generated an amazing amount of participation and discussion (some quite heated) since its introduction last week. Buzz can also be a huge time suck, and its convenient presence in Gmail — upon which I depend — hasn’t helped my writing output over the past few days.

It’s kind of like opening a bag of potato chips. Sure, you could eat just one and save the rest for later. But most of us don’t stop until we get to the crunchy bits at the bottom. That’s where I’m at with social media. It’s time to brush away the crumbs and go on a content sharing diet.

Eliminating rich and fatty foods

Any real diet starts with cutting the most calorie-rich foods. You know — the good stuff. To me, things like Buzz and Friendfeed are the most hypnotic. They’re full of rich content, smart discussion, and realtime goodness. They are the strawberry cheesecake of the social media world.

I’ve already bid farewell to Friendfeed. I’m not going to leave Buzz (which, based on open standards, is likely a first step toward the sort of social media nirvana I ranted about last month). But I am going to turn it off for a bit. I’ll certainly be back. By that time, Google will have added the service filtering and simpler contact management it needs to be less noisy.

I’m enthusiastic about Google Buzz. But I’m going to leave that bag of chips sealed for now.

Fewer, smaller meals

Nutritionists will tell you that eating six small meals is a better idea than gorging once or twice. I’m going to try this with social media. Rather than “holding court” a couple times a day on a given service, I’m going to split my activity into six or so timed periods. In fact, I’ll schedule these.

This technique seems particularly conducive to Twitter, which is my best-developed and best-organized network. Buzz and Friendfeed are essentially asynchronous. You can pump several items in at a time, and they’ll keep rising to the top of your followers’ queues as people comment. The conversations which form around items can go on for days.

That’s not the case with Twitter. Sure, people who maintain very small lists or check their friends’ profiles may reply to older tweets. Generally, though, Twitter is as perishable as it is synchronous. Most conversations happen when you’re present. Jumping on for short, regularly spaced sessions will likely improve my engagement — without creating productivity roadblocks.

More exercise

My most important social networks are actually email and my sites. These are where I interact online with the people who mean the most to me: my family, closest friends, professional associates — and my readers.

So that’s where I’ll invest my time. There are more social destinations and services than one person could ever serve without extensive automation and duplication. I’d rather prioritize and put the essential first. This isn’t just a digital diet — it’s an exercise in minimalism, something I write about quite a bit these days.

If I were writing this in the practical manner of More Minimal or Lighter Footstep, my Social Media Diet would boil down to these things:

Look at where you’re spending your time. Set aside services consuming the most attention.

Establish limits. I’ll be splitting my social media time into 10-minutes blocks, six times a day. Your numbers may be different, and mine are certainly subject to revision.

Concentrate on what’s important to you. In my case, that’s Twitter and Facebook. I’m hoping all this will give me more time for writing, answering reader comments on my sites, and keeping my inbox clear.

Like all diet plans, monitor the results. For me, the bathroom scale will be the successful launch of my next site, The Minimalist Century, and an uptick in the number of articles I publish each month.

Be prepared to cheat. What’s the point of a diet if you can’t have a slice of pecan pie now and then? If you’ve got some extra time, indulge. Don’t forget the ice cream on top.

Feel free to follow me on Twitter and Facebook. And Google Buzz, for that matter. I’ll be back as soon as I can fit into my skinny jeans again.

Post image by Lee Carson, distributed under a Creative Common license.

{ 3 trackbacks }

Five interesting Twitter users to follow on EcoMonday
15 February, 2010 at 4:14 pm
Google Buzz - Social Media in Your Inbox | TweetFunnel
18 February, 2010 at 10:56 am
Google Buzz - Social Media in Your Inbox | MediaFunnel
27 April, 2010 at 10:29 pm

{ 8 comments… read them below or add one }

CASUDI 15 February, 2010 at 2:03 am

Since I actively joined a social network (twitter) at the end of 08, I have been very careful about getting addicted, and addicted to multiple networks. I started dieting at the onset. I have not joined FB and I checked BUZZ last week, and like you that bag of chips can remain closed right now. I limit chats (chats are the most addictive) to 3 twitter chats (3 hours) a week; well that stretched to 4:-) I've only seen you on one chat, which is where I met you, however I have and continue to meet the best connections on twitter chats :-) All in all I limit the hours Social Networking to what I used to give TV (but I've not had a TV for over 10 years) so it has cut into my Book time, and I find I am now doing most of my reading online.

Even with all these good intentions (just like real dieting) I am getting addicted to commenting and the conversations that ensue. My 2010 New Year's resolution is to comment on someone else's blog every day, and at least 50% of the time on new bloggers; I want to encourage and explore. I haven''t counted my comments but my sense is on average about 4 times a week plus my own. I find commenting extremely worthwhile networking and appreciate more freedom then 140. Yet 140 is very elegant in it's brevity and fleeting mindset. I like how you put it ~ Twitter is as perishable as it is synchronous.

Most of my business focused networking happens via email where I have now participated for over 15 years, however I can see this eroding here and there around the edges to twitter and commenting. Just one more comment today, on a new blog …… Wisdom of Solomon (second post) ………….

@CASUDI

Reply

Chris Baskind 15 February, 2010 at 2:40 am

I'm like you: no TV, but I've transferred the time I'd spend in front of the tube to my keyboard. A good trade, I think. :-)

What constitutes productivity is strictly in the eye of the beholder. You're right, we also do “business” on twitter (though that means different things to different people).

Thanks for bringing your New Year's resolution here today!

Reply

@silverton 15 February, 2010 at 3:27 am

Chris, you absolutely nailed it. “Keep the bag of chips sealed.” If we cheat — as we all will — take only a small handful, reseal. Then again, long distance marathoners like Louis Gray, Robert Scoble — possibly the Louis & Clark of extended, collective cognition — are in such a different category than rest of us, they can probably afford to consume many more discretionary calories.

I especially like what you wrote in Beyond Babylonian Captivity[1],”this is where social media must go: directly attached to the content, wherever it is consumed.” He's also clear that none of us is “sure exactly how all this will look … But if you want a glimpse of what’s to come, pay attention to folks like Chris Messina and Dave Winer. These are the people who are doing more than pontificating about the future of social media: they’re imagining it. They’re developing the standards and protocols we’ll take for granted in five years. They’re helping to liberate us from the soft chauvinism of social media web services.”

Godspeed to each of them, and of course @DeWitt Clinton http://www.google.com/buzz/dclinton/XxER6oP4WGe...

[1] Beyond the Babylonian captivity of social media web services http://chrisbaskind.com/2010/01/28/beyond-the-b...

P.S. I couldn't post this in reply to your buzz, so adding it here, in addition to a version of your article that was shared by Louis Gray http://www.google.com/buzz/louisgray/e6cii9jtiF...

The problem that many of us are having posting comments to Reader Shared Items in Buzz may be due to Google Reader settings on the author's end; apparently a semi-known Buzz-bug, if this item from Susan Beebe is any indication http://www.google.com/buzz/susan.beebe/QizQc3Vj...

Reply

Tyler Wainright 15 February, 2010 at 3:32 am

Great article. I thought I was handling all the social media okay until Buzz hit; now I feel like I'm getting hit in every direction. I use Feedly to read my RSS feeds and it does a good job of highlighting the more popular articles out there.

Reply

Chris Baskind 15 February, 2010 at 3:47 am

For Robert and Louis, social media commentary is a large measure of their product. So it's natural they participate to such a level. I'm actually kind of embarrassed I write about it as often as you see around here. I'm just a user. They're the pros. ;-)

Good call on including @DeWitt. Another Imagineer.

I don't want anyone to think I'm knocking Buzz — I love it. I'll be back, and expect to find it more useful and easy to manage.

Reply

Chris Baskind 15 February, 2010 at 3:49 am

Feedly is beautiful. I'd use it more, but I'm really fond of WebKit browsers. It's installed on my copy of Firefox.

Reply

BitterEnd 15 February, 2010 at 6:08 pm

And it's not enough we spend lots of time in social media. With a proper cellphone or laptop we have an access practically anywhere we are. First time I read this article I was in a bus on my way to work. Most of us can't handle few days without e-mail, sms, feeds etc. When I travel it's pretty easy to take the good old N800 with me and in the hotel ask the username and password for the wifi. I guess next time I can handle three days without. On the other hand…. ;-)

Reply

HRJ 16 February, 2010 at 5:37 am

For those interested in a minimalist, fat free, Twitter client, here is one I developed:

http://tdash.org

Can't say it saved me time, cause of time spent on development. But as a user, it surely helped.

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: